data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/110cf/110cf5220bcfd3a3e1d6ffb833f8ef86e8d52449" alt=""
There is another version in the Wallace Collection catalogue, shown below, which is entitled "An Unknown Girl in a Scottish Costume" - fig 125 in the Wallace Collection Catalogue and that version is signed "Sicardi 1799".
Although there is no Internet link to the image, for more about the Wallace Collection see Wallace Collection: Great British Watercolours in the Wallace ...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b09cc/b09cc964767f286a9e57c515df32548cc8789716" alt=""
This collector has recently communicated with the Jacquemart-Andre Museum in Paris, but they can find no record of their collection ever having included a version of this portrait. Thus it seems there was an error in Lespinasse.
However, as the Wallace Collection catalogue records that Lespinasse did include an illustration of the version in his book, as plate xxv, fig. 85, a second version must have existed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc6bd/fc6bdc54f5ded757263f0415165eee7428065cd7" alt=""
It is therefore quite possible that the version included in this collection and depicted above, is the second version referred to by Lespinasse, as the quality of the miniature compares very favourably with the Wallace image shown here. 1107
No comments:
Post a Comment